AMSTERDAM -- The Dutch agency that approved Tesla Motors' "Autopilot" driver assistance system for use throughout Europe is considering what action to take, if any, on the name after several German organizations said it could be misleading.
"The RDW has no official opinion about the name Autopilot, as normally we only consider technical aspects and not names," said spokesman Hans van Geenhuizen of the Dutch Road Traffic Service (RDW) on Monday.
"This is new," he said, referring to the possibility that the name of a driving technology itself could be relevant to a safety review.
On Sunday, Germany's Transport Minister said it had asked Tesla to stop using the term Autopilot in advertising because it might suggest drivers' attention was not needed.
Tesla said in response to that request that the term autopilot had been used in the aerospace industry for decades to describe a system operating in conjunction with a human driver, and the company had always made it clear to customers that the system required drivers to pay attention at all times.
Tesla's Autopilot, introduced last October, helps drivers steer and stay in lane and is intended to assist -- but not replace -- drivers. The system has been the focus of intense scrutiny since a Tesla Model S driver was killed while using the technology in a May 7 collision with a truck in Florida.
Van Geenhuizen said RDW was considering the matter internally and would make its official position known -- if it decides to issue one -- today.
In 2015, the RDW approved Tesla's "Autopilot" feature for use throughout Europe. The agency's possible concerns would only relate to the name and not to the system itself.
On Friday Germany's Federal Motor Transport Authority KBA wrote to owners of Tesla cars, warning them that their vehicles could not be operated without their constant attention and that under traffic regulations they must remain alert.
But German consumer protection agency VZBV said on Monday the "Autopilot" system should not be on the roads. "A letter to Tesla drivers urging them not to use the Autopilot is not sufficient. That shifts to consumers the responsibility for a failure that happened in the approval," VZBV said in an emailed statement.